analogy

• الأدب

In modern Arabic, adab is often associated with “literature” and “politeness.” During the formative period of Arabic literature (second/eighth to third/ninth centuries), however, it denotes a broad concept of ethical erudition. Although one may assume some proximity to “humanism,” “paidea” or “Bildung” in their all-encompassing sense of multidisciplinary education, the authors of adab usually emphasize its relevance for both this world and the hereafter, thus linking it to Islamic conceptions of knowledge production. In more general terms, in the writings attributed to early ʿAbbāsid authors like the state scribe Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ and the polymathic theologian al-Jāḥiẓ, adab refers both to teaching the particulars of general morality, which may derive from a variety of sources (e.g., scripture, wise men, former civilizations, sometimes in the plural: ādāb), and to the very relation of these particulars to the human intellect (al-ʿaql), which alone is able to use and assess them. The early theologian al-Muḥāsibī, one of the first Sufi writers on adab, alludes to a similar understanding grounded in a relational definition. In this early stage, adab is typically defined through images, often drawn from the natural world, that express the very interdependence of moral instructions and a “fertile” human faculty of intellection (al-ʿaql), which itself needs to be “nurtured” by adab in order to “grow.” By drawing on the interplay between moral particulars and the human intellectual disposition, adab connects ethics with epistemology, thereby suggesting a universal dimension of literature.

• الحكاية على ألسنة البهائم

Neither the classical nor premodern Arabic language has a single term to denote the literary genre “fable” that is widely known in the European literatures since antiquity. Studies of the relevant genre in premodern Arabic literature mainly adopted the modern Western definition of the beast fable. Even the few existing comprehensive studies, such as those by Carl Brockelmann, Iḥsān ʿAbbās, or Robert Irwin, did not attempt to define the Arabic genre in relation to its dominantly perceived Western sibling. The present analysis and definition rely on a pragmatic bottom-up approach premised on the hypothesis that tales featuring speaking animals in premodern Arabic literature resemble the fables of the Graeco-Latin tradition in their central features. It focuses on the anonymous narratives featuring speaking animals scattered as single items or in small clusters or specific chapters in a large variety of different works of premodern Arabic literature. The presently identified corpus consists of about 160 items in a total of more than 1,000 individual attestations. The analysis of the corpus leads to a detailed definition of the Arabic fable, identified as a narrative (ḥikāya, ḥadīth, nādira, ramz) in which speaking beasts/animals (ʿalā alsinat/alsun/lisān al-bahāʾim/al-ḥayawān or equivalent) feature as protagonists. This definition is both more exclusive and more inclusive than that of its sibling genre in the Graeco-Latin tradition. On the one hand, the Arabic genre is predominantly an animal tale excluding narratives that prominently feature human beings; on the other hand, the genre also includes short linguistic exercises that lack a narrative dimension.